Intra-operative Tranexamic Acid Administration Significantly Decreases Incidence of Postoperative Bleeding Without Increasing Venous Thromboembolism Risk After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study of Over 400 Patients.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces surgical bleeding and is widely used in trauma, obstetrics and other specialties. This practice is less well-established in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) due to concerns surrounding venous thromboembolism (VTE); equally postoperative bleeding is a serious complication often requiring re-operation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared 30-day outcomes following primary LSG in patients receiving intra-operative TXA (March 2020-July 2022) to those who did not (March 2011-March 2020). The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding (Hb < 9 g/dL) requiring transfusion or re-operation. Secondary outcomes were incidence of VTE, serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > grade 3) and death. Patients underwent standardised-protocol LSG without staple line re-enforcement under a single surgeon within the independent sector (private practice). TXA 1 g intravenous was administered immediately after a methylene blue leak test, prior to extubation. RESULTS: TXA group had 226 patients and non-TXA group had 192 patients. Mean age was 40.5 ± 10.3 and 39.1 ± 9.8 years, respectively. In the TXA group, no postoperative bleeds [versus 3 (1.6%) in non-TXA group, p = 0.0279] occurred. One staple line leak (0.4%) occurred in the TXA group compared to zero in the non-TXA group (p = ns). There was no VTE or death. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort study of intra-operative TXA in primary LSG to date, which demonstrates significant decrease in postoperative bleeding without increasing VTE risk. The authors recommend administration of TXA immediately following leak test, or removal of bougie to maximise efficacy. Data of TXA in LSG is awaited from the randomised controlled PATAS trial.

COVID-19 Mortality and Progress Toward Vaccinating Older Adults - World Health Organization, Worldwide, 2020-2022.

After the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019, transmission expanded globally, and on January 30, 2020, COVID-19 was declared a public health emergency of international concern.* Analysis of the early Wuhan, China outbreak (1), subsequently confirmed by multiple other studies (2,3), found that 80% of deaths occurred among persons aged ≥60 years. In anticipation of the time needed for the global vaccine supply to meet all needs, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) Values Framework and a roadmap for prioritizing use of COVID-19 vaccines in late 2020 (4,5), followed by a strategy brief to outline urgent actions in October 2021.† WHO described the general principles, objectives, and priorities needed to support country planning of vaccine rollout to minimize severe disease and death. A July 2022 update to the strategy brief§ prioritized vaccination of populations at increased risk, including older adults,¶ with the goal of 100% coverage with a complete COVID-19 vaccination series** for at-risk populations. Using available public data on COVID-19 mortality (reported deaths and model estimates) for 2020 and 2021 and the most recent reported COVID-19 vaccination coverage data from WHO, investigators performed descriptive analyses to examine age-specific mortality and global vaccination rollout among older adults (as defined by each country), stratified by country World Bank income status. Data quality and COVID-19 death reporting frequency varied by data source; however, persons aged ≥60 years accounted for >80% of the overall COVID-19 mortality across all income groups, with upper- and lower-middle-income countries accounting for 80% of the overall estimated excess mortality. Effective COVID-19 vaccines were authorized for use in December 2020, with global supply scaled up sufficiently to meet country needs by late 2021 (6). COVID-19 vaccines are safe and highly effective in reducing severe COVID-19, hospitalizations, and mortality (7,8); nevertheless, country-reported median completed primary series coverage among adults aged ≥60 years only reached 76% by the end of 2022, substantially below the WHO goal, especially in middle- and low-income countries. Increased efforts are needed to increase primary series and booster dose coverage among all older adults as recommended by WHO and national health authorities.

The World Health Organization's public health intelligence activities during the COVID-19 pandemic response, December 2019 to December 2021.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) presented a unique opportunity for the World Health Organization (WHO) to utilise public health intelligence (PHI) for pandemic response. WHO systematically captured mainly unstructured information (e.g. media articles, listservs, community-based reporting) for public health intelligence purposes. WHO used the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources (EIOS) system as one of the information sources for PHI. The processes and scope for PHI were adapted as the pandemic evolved and tailored to regional response needs. During the early months of the pandemic, media monitoring complemented official case and death reporting through the International Health Regulations mechanism and triggered alerts. As the pandemic evolved, PHI activities prioritised identifying epidemiological trends to supplement the information available through indicator-based surveillance reported to WHO. The PHI scope evolved over time to include vaccine introduction, emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, unusual clinical manifestations and upsurges in cases, hospitalisation and death incidences at subnational levels. Triaging the unprecedented high volume of information challenged surveillance activities but was managed by collaborative information sharing. The evolution of PHI activities using multiple sources in WHO's response to the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the future directions in which PHI methodologies could be developed and used.

Modified Interscalene Approach for Resection of Symptomatic Cervical Rib: Anatomic Review and Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical ribs have been reported to be present in about 0.5% of the general population, 10% of patients with cervical rib who are symptomatic usually have neurogenic symptoms, but some have arterial symptoms. In 1861, Coote was the first to excise a cervical rib through a supraclavicular approach and relieved the symptoms of thoracic outlet syndrome. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we address the efficacy and safety of a modification to the supraclavicular approach for resection of symptomatic cervical ribs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The surgical team in collaboration with an anatomist performed cadaveric dissections of the posterior triangle of the neck in the Department of Anatomy, Ain Shams University. A prospective study was performed of 25 patients with moderate to severe neck or upper limb pain; this pain was resistant to medical treatment for at least 6 months. Preoperative cervical radiography showed cervical ribs. Pain was assessed by using the visual analog scale. Electrophysiologic tests were performed to confirm the diagnosis. In this study, we performed a modified supraclavicular interscalene approach with resection of the symptomatic rib and without resecting either of the scalene muscles or the first thoracic rib. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were included in this study; the mean age was 36 years (± 12 standard deviation), and the mean follow-up period was 12.3 months. All patients had moderate (28%) to severe (72%) preoperative pain. Motor deficits were present in 6 cases (24%); Sensory manifestations were present in 80%. All patients had a relief of severe pain at the first postoperative visit in the first week. There were improvements in the motor power in 5 of the 6 patients who had preoperative motor deficit. CONCLUSIONS: A modified supraclavicular interscalene approach for resection of symptomatic cervical ribs has been shown to be effective in the treatment of neuralgic pain. Compared with other approaches, it proved to be less invasive, with small transverse incision and without resection of scalenus anterior muscle.